Compensation Clause - Article 1, Section 6, Clause 1

  The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. 

                                                                                             ARTICLE I, SECTION 6, CLAUSE 1

COMMENT: There were two critical questions that the Framers attempted to solve: Would federal legislators be paid at all? And, if so, would they be paid by their respective states, or by the federal government?

The first question was whether the federal legislators would be paid at all. The Framers feared that unpaid legislators would turn corrupt in order to supplement their very own incomes. They thought that not paying legislators might attract candidates without a sense of duty to their country, and limit the candidates to being wealthy – inadvertently creating a legislative plutocracy.

The second question dealt with the source of payment. Most of the Framers wanted the legislators to be paid by the Federal Government verses by the States, which was the case under the Articles of Confederation. They thought that being paid by federal funds would make them less beholden to the states since they were being called to a national service.

Currently, Congress has broad flexibility is designing legislative compensation schemes; however, it is subject to the Twenty-Seventy Amendment that prevents a sitting congress from giving itself a raise that takes effect during its term.

Adjournment - Article 1, Section 5, Clause 4

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.  Adjournment - Article 1, Section 5, Clause 4

Comment: The Framers made sure that the two Congressional chambers had equity regarding the operations of the Legislative Branch, which was an important check on their power. For example, the Framers did not want one House to prevent the other from meeting and performing its duties.  Also, under this provision, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate would be able use its power to adjourn to another time or place in order to check the actions of the other. 

Moreover, at the Convention, some were worried that the two Houses of Congress would move the "government" by simply agreeing upon the place to meet. So, the Convention decided that Congress could by "law" establish the seat of government (See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17), but the Framers did leave Congress the ability to make temporary moves in the event of emergency circumstances. For example, during the 1790s, the three branches moved from Philadelphia to Trenton and during the  War of 1812, the government moved to Washington.

While the President can adjourn Congress under Article II, Section 3, in the event Congress cannot agree, the two chambers have always come to an agreement as to when to adjourn. However, these provisions have not been without unintended consequences. For example, one of the first instances was when the Southern states seceded from the Union. They deprived the sitting Congress of a quorum. In order to continue governing, President Abraham Lincoln issued the very first Presidential Order on April 15, 1861, Executive Order 1.

The most complex consequence of Clause 4 relates to when Congress takes a recess and when it adjourns. A recess is a temporary halt to activity on the floor. Everything stops, and when the recess ends, the chamber resumes from where it left off. A recess might last 10 minutes or it might last weeks. The length of time does not matter. An adjournment is a formal end to business in the chamber, and upon return the chamber does not resume from where it left off. Just like a recess an adjournment can be for one minute or for three weeks. However, unlike a recess, an adjournment creates a new legislative day.

House Journal - Article I, Section 5, Clause 3

Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

COMMENT: The House Journal Clause requires each house to keep a journal of its proceedings. A journal is a book that records the actions and ideas of a person or group. This was to "ensure publicity" and "responsibility...to their...constituents" as stated by Justice Joseph Story.

To be sure, the requirement to keep a journal was not controversial; however, the provision allowing certain matters to be kept secret did cause concern. For example, Patrick Henry stated, "The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." Others were concerned that publishing only "from time to time" would further conceal their actions. However, Madison argued that it was only to allow for flexibility, accuracy, and convenience.

In any event, the journal did not publish all that useful of information; it usually published lists of bills and resolutions, etc., not word for word debates and testimony. As a result, the secrecy matter really applied to whether the proceedings would be open to the public.

Although both houses have complete discretion over what proceedings will be secret, Congress has not used its privilege of keeping information secret all that much (the Senate has used it more than the House) - keeping such matters private as to impeachment, classified information, and national defense as a general rule.

While not required to do so, in 1873 Congress implemented the Congressional Record, which includes debates and undelivered remarks and documents. In addition, journals, newspapers, radio, and television (like C-SPAN) have made most of the actions of Congress open to the public as a whole.

Primary Source - The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Rules and Expulsion Clause - Article I, Section 5, Clause 2

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Comment:  The Constitution permits the House and the Senate to determine their own rules of proceedings. To that end, it helped secure the independence of the Congress from the executive and judicial branch. Under this provision, representatives and senators may be expelled for inappropriate behavior with two-thirds vote. Originally, there was not a two-thirds requirement; however, Madison was concerned that the majority party would abuse its power and expel minority members if only a majority vote was required.

While impeachment is a process of accusing an official of wrongdoing before a tribunal - i.e., a president could be impeached for committing a crime. Expulsion, however, means being removed from office and is the only Constitutional tool to remove a sitting Member from office.